What? The primaries are getting hot? Well, if you live in California and actually believe in
peace and freedom*, they are. Kinda. PFP is a California-only party right now with national aspirations, so there's some push and some pull. For the upcoming election, this means that
the party's Presidential candidate will necessarily be cross-endorsed by parties active in other states. So, here are my choices for the primary next month:
* Stewart Alexander, nominee of the Socialist Party U.S.A.
* Ross C. “Rocky” Anderson, nominee of the Justice Party
* Stephen Durham, nominee of the Freedom Socialist Party
* Peta Lindsay, nominee of the Party for Socialism and Liberation
Three of the four will appear on my ballot. Lindsay was struck from the ballot by the state of California because she's not yet 35 and thus too young to win the Presidency. As if too [fill in the blank] to win really means anything for this party's nominating slate.
Anderson appeals to, I imagine, the "practical" PFP voter. As the one-time mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, he's the only formal former officeholder. Of course, that's also the problem. He's a Democrat who hit the ceiling of his influence, so went into business for himself. Party is also a major issue for Lindsay—PSL is an odd split from Workers World, a strange Stalinoid party with Trotkyist roots. There's been no public comment on the split between PSL and WW, and nobody's managed to suss out a political difference by reading their publications and comparing the two. So the whole party smells like a trap to me.
Then we have Durham of the Freedom Socialist Party, which I know primarily through their feminist front Radical Women. They're not terrible. I like that
Durham talks about his running mate a lot. The Socialist Party is a** daughter party of the classic party of Eugene Debs, and their candidate is
an automotive sales consultant? Is that a used-car salesperson? I could get behind that!
So, Alexander or Durham. Obviously, the question, ultimately, is which campaign is not just trying to raid Peace and Freedom, and which would do more for ballot access for a left alternative. I'm leaving toward Alexander in this, as the SPUSA will probably be on the ballot on eight states by itself, and PFP would make nine, but I am still contemplating. One wouldn't want the SP to swamp PFP either!
See, being a "swing" voter is hard! Aren't you glad all of your decisions have already been made for you?
*Am I saying that Californians who are members of other parties are interested in war and slavery? Yes, yes I am.
**They would say they are
the daughter party, and I am inclined to agree.